By David Adger

ISBN-10: 0262018616

ISBN-13: 9780262018616

ISBN-10: 0262312239

ISBN-13: 9780262312233

ISBN-10: 0262518309

ISBN-13: 9780262518307

In A Syntax of Substance, David Adger proposes a brand new method of word constitution that eschews useful heads and labels buildings exocentrically. His suggestion concurrently simplifies the syntactic approach and restricts the diversity of attainable buildings, ruling out the ever present (remnant) roll-up derivations and forcing a separation of arguments from their obvious heads. This new method has a couple of empirical outcomes, which Adger explores within the area of relational nominals throughout diverse language households, together with Germanic, Romance, Celtic, Polynesian, and Semitic. He indicates that the relationality of such nouns as hand, edge, or mother -- which appear to have as a part of their that means a relation among components -- is admittedly a part of the syntactic illustration during which they're used instead of an inherent a part of their that means. This empirical consequence follows without delay from the recent syntactic procedure, as does a singular research of PP enhances to nouns and possessors. Given this, he argues that nouns can, as a rule, be considered easily necessities of substance, differentiating them from real predicates.

A Syntax of Substance bargains an cutting edge contribution to debates in theoretical syntax in regards to the nature of syntactic representations and the way they hook up with semantic interpretation and linear order.

Show description

Read Online or Download A syntax of substance PDF

Best grammar books

Download e-book for kindle: Grammar of the Tibetan language, literary and colloquial; by Herbert Bruce Hannah

Grammar of the Tibetan language literary and colloquial. В книге широко представлена литературная и разговорная грамматика тибетского языка.

New PDF release: The Evolution of Negation TILSM 235

Why do languages swap? The thought that the grammar of negation evolves in response to cycles is checked out from the behaviour of destructive goods and buildings, regularly throughout the historical past of English and French. The reviews express that the difference inside a language at any given aspect of background is just too nice for cycles to be invoked as an self sustaining mechanism of grammar swap.

Morphology: Word Structure in Generative Grammar - download pdf or read online

A self-contained and full of life textual content ready in line with a perceived want for an updated advent to the sphere of morphology in the framework of generative grammar. the cloth is gifted within the framework of the lexicalist speculation of Chomsky (1970), but in addition taking within the newer improvement of lexicalist phonology and morphology within the works of Paul Kiparsky and others.

Get Studies on Agreement PDF

The prestige of contract is a center factor in present morphological and syntactic conception. the gathering of papers during this quantity specializes in vital matters, resembling the character of the relation among syntax and morphology in choosing contract family; no matter if and which syntactic configurations are proper for opting for contract; the relevance of verbal contract for the needs of EPP; the inquiry into the lifestyles of connections among verbal and DP-internal contract; at the morphological and syntactic contrast of individual, quantity and gender contract; how and why AGREE and Spec,head kin set off assorted contract results; and the kind of relation that exists among head-movement and morphological contract.

Additional resources for A syntax of substance

Example text

The role of the syntactic relations of i-complement and i-specifier is to impose a semantic ordering of operations. I will also assume that the interpretation of a case where a label recurses involves the identity function (even though the syntactic relation is an i-complement relation). This gives us:4 (22) In a structure [γ α β], α optional, a. If β is the i-complement of γ, where label(γ)>label(β) then [[γ]] = [[[label(γ)]]◦([[β]])]◦([[α]]) b. If β is the i-complement of γ, where label(γ)=label(β) then [[γ]] = [[β]]◦([[α]]) Here ◦ is a variable over any combinatory rule.

Dependent in the representational system of Brody and Szabolcsi (2003). However, the definitions here do share an important commonality with the standard view, in that i-specifier is the elsewhere case. I-complements are assigned when a conjunction of requirements is met (both the mother and daughter constituent are in the same REP, the daughter is lower or equal in that REP, and no other daughter is in the same REP), whereas the definition of i-specifier is parasitic 46 Chapter 3 on successful assignment of the i-complement relation.

Merge y with y = {y, y} = {y}. Merge {{x}} with {y} = {{{x}}, {y}}. The immediate issue to address now is that of the label of these various constituents. , the only LI is x). If it is heads that provide labels, and all structure needs to be labeled, then we could rule out unary branching structures (see Kayne 2010). However, I want to pursue here the idea that the effect of iterated Self Merge is to create an extended projection of the initial root category in the absence of any further merger of heads.

Download PDF sample

A syntax of substance by David Adger

by Donald

New PDF release: A syntax of substance
Rated 4.77 of 5 – based on 36 votes